Explore in 3DBook a demo
The Build wing · 3 agents

Tests first. Then the code.

Build works your backlog issue by issue. The Dev agent implements each ticket with Test-Driven Development (TDD), the Review agent reviews every change on its own track, and the SAST agent scans it for security flaws before it merges. Routine changes flow. Anything architectural, security-sensitive or wide-reaching goes to a named engineer.

Book a 30-minute demoMeet the agents
DVDev agent#0311RVReview agent#0326SASTSAST agent#0342
Reads
The backlog, the architecture, the test suites
Produces
Reviewed, scanned pull requests, synced with your tracker
Gate
An engineer approves every change that matters

The board stays in sync with your GitHub or Jira, so your team watches progress where it already works.

How it works

Write it, review it, scan it.

Three agents on three separate tracks, each with its own start and stop. A change only moves on when all three are satisfied, or a person has decided.

Reads

Backlog in your tracker
Architecture
Test suites

Agents

DVDev agentAgent #0311
RVReview agentAgent #0326
SASTSAST agentAgent #0342

Produces

Tested code
Reviewed pull requests
Security findings, fixed
A record of every change

Gate

An engineer approves every change that mattersM. Keller · 14:48
Stage
The agents

Meet the 3 agents.

Each one has a codename, one job and a record of everything it did. These views show a sample project.

DVDev agentAgent #0311

Implements every ticket with Test-Driven Development.

It picks up ready tickets from the board, reads the requirement and its acceptance criteria, starts from the failing tests and writes the code that makes them pass, then opens a pull request that cites the requirement it implements. When two rules conflict, it doesn’t pick the convenient one: it stops, lays out both and asks an engineer.

Reads

  • Tickets and acceptance criteria
  • The architecture
  • Test cases

Produces

  • Code and pull requests
  • Implementation notes
  • Questions, when rules conflict
Dev agent · sample project, illustrative
RVReview agentAgent #0326

Reviews every change. Routes the risky ones.

It reviews each pull request on its own track, independent of the Dev agent. Routine changes it reviews in full. Changes that touch the architecture, security-sensitive paths or a wide blast radius go to a named engineer, so human attention lands on the four diffs that matter, not the forty that don’t.

Reads

  • Pull requests
  • Requirements and architecture

Produces

  • Review comments
  • Approvals
  • Hand-offs to a named engineer
Review agent · sample project, illustrative
SASTSAST agentAgent #0342

Scans every change before it merges.

Static security analysis runs on every pull request. Findings become tickets on the same board as any other defect, linked to the code and to the requirement or policy they touch, and they travel the same loop: fixed, reviewed, scanned again.

Reads

  • Every pull request

Produces

  • Findings, graded by severity
  • Tickets on the board
  • A clean scan before merge
SAST agent · sample project, illustrative
The gate · Build → Stage

Every change that matters has a name on it.

Most changes are reviewed by the Review agent. The ones that could hurt you are reviewed by a person, and the system decides which is which from what the change actually touches.

Gate checklistBuild → Stage
  • Every change reviewed: by the Review agent, or by an engineer when it matters
  • No open high or critical security findings
  • Policy conflicts escalated, never resolved silently
  • The board and your tracker agree
MK
M. Kellerlead engineer
Approved · 14:48
Guardrails

What the Build wing never does.

  • Tests come first, in their own stage. Nothing skips them quietly.
  • One path to production: every change, fixes included, goes through this board.
  • Every pause, question and answer is recorded with who and when.
The red thread

One ID, through Build.

  1. RequirementBRQ-0014
  2. Ticket#162
  3. CodePR 250
  4. ScanSAST clean
  5. Build1.4.0

The pull request cites the requirement it implements, so review, security findings and the build all know which business goal they serve.

  1. AnalyzeRead the system you already have
  2. PlanTurn the goal into testable requirements
  3. BuildTests first, then the code
  4. StageStand it up somewhere real
  5. VerifyProve it works, requirement by requirement
  6. ReleaseShip it, with a way back
  7. OperateKeep watching, close the loop
See it on a real project

Watch Build run, in thirty minutes.

We open Orlian on a live project and walk you through the Build wing: what goes in, what the agents produce, and where a person signs. No slides.

Book a 30-minute demoSee it on the campus